🔗 Share this article

During the previous presidential campaign, the former president courted the electorate with pledges to reduce prices starting on day one. But, after his inauguration, there was minimal attention to affordability issues. All that changed following inflation-weary voters expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Shortly thereafter, the Trump administration launched a slapdash campaign to tackle living costs. Unfortunately, this initiative is a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, inconsistencies, unrealistic expectations, blame-shifting, and Trumpian dishonesty.

Detached Assertions and Supermarket Truth

Merely 48 hours post-election, Trump began his cost-reduction push with a disastrous statement: “Our groceries are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” This comment from the wealthy leader—who frequently mingles with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he ignored their struggles as unimportant, implying they were mistaken about price levels.

This statement about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could all costs be falling when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Official statistics show banana prices rose 6.9% over the past year, the price of beef climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged by nearly 19%—in part due to punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. Between January and September, prices rose in five of the six main grocery groups monitored by the government’s price index, such as animal proteins (up 4.5%), drinks (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Contradictions and Falsehoods in Financial Claims

Despite these numbers, Trump continues to push his big lie about lower costs. After the vote, he has claimed there is “almost no price increases,” declared “prices are way down,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” These statements contradict the reality that general costs have unarguably risen since Biden left office. At present, price growth is running at a 3 percent per year, that’s 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. Adding to the inaccuracies, Trump claimed that gas prices had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, despite official data indicate they average over three dollars.

Faced with reality and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “prices are down” message made him sound disconnected from typical Americans. Many voters are frustrated about prices continuing to climb following assurances of decreases. As a result, advisers suggested one quick fix: reduce some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. This sensible idea clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that new tariffs would not increase costs for US consumers.

Suggested Fixes and Their Possible Impact

As certain taxes reduced on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has cut prices once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a fire that he ignited. On another occasion, when addressing McDonald’s executives, he declared that “we are in the golden age of America” and assured listeners that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” These comments come naturally for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to countless households facing hardships—particularly when millions face losing food stamps or skyrocketing health premiums.

Per a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are fair or poor, while only 26% consider them good or excellent. Another poll found that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Economic Reality and Proposed Measures

Scott Bessent, Trump’s chief financial officer, recently disputed assertions of a prosperous era. He noted that far from booming, some parts of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—a priority for the administration—appears to have contracted for eight months in a row and lost approximately 33,000 jobs since January. Pointing to this weakness, Bessent called on the central bank to reduce borrowing costs—a move that could ease financial pressure.

Reacting to public dismay about affordability, the president proposed a cash handout of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “high income people.” For many households in need, it seems like a financial lifeline, but the prospects are dim that Congress—already alarmed about huge budget deficits—will approve the proposal. This idea could raise government expenditure, push up borrowing costs, and possibly fuel inflation by injecting cash into the economy.

A further supposed fix for affordability centered on introducing 50-year mortgages, based on the idea that this would lower housing costs. However, reality is that such lengthy loans have minimal impact to reduce installments—often reducing them by a small amount per month. The drawback is that these mortgages could significantly increase the overall cost borrowers pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Faulting the Previous Administration and Economic Prospects

As part of their affordability campaign, the administration have once more blamed Biden for economic problems, including increasing costs. Spokespeople claimed they “faced a mess from Joe Biden” and were “addressing the prior administration’s price hikes.” This is absurd and inaccurate allegations. Actually, the former president handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. However, the current administration’s actions—particularly import taxes—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

According to Mark Zandi, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are experiencing economic decline, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi worries that if key regions such as California and New York enter a downturn, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. During recessions, consumers generally possess less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, with Trump’s much-ballyhooed affordability campaign probably ineffective to control costs, his primary method for improving living standards might prove to be triggering an economic contraction—something that struggling Americans really can’t afford.